Mike Waltz-Gmail Scandal: Did Trump’s Advisor Share Sensitive Info Over Unsecured Email?

Who is Mike Waltz: A Green Beret to National Security Advisor This article provides an in-depth look at Mike Waltz’s personal life, army time, career, and potential impact as National Security Advisor in Trump's new cabinet.

After Signal chat scandal, Mike Waltz accused of using personal Gmail for official communication

National Security Advisor Mike Waltz is at the center of a growing controversy after reports revealed he and members of his staff used personal Gmail accounts to conduct official government business — including communications involving sensitive military operations and advanced weapons systems.

The revelations, first published by The Washington Post, have sparked national security concerns and renewed bipartisan scrutiny of how top officials handle sensitive information in the Trump administration.

Personal Email Used for Sensitive Government Work

According to internal records and U.S. officials cited in the report, a senior aide to Waltz used a personal Gmail account to hold “highly technical conversations” with officials at other government agencies. These emails reportedly included details about sensitive military positions and weapons systems linked to an ongoing conflict.

While the emails were not classified, experts warn that any technical military data — even unclassified — can still pose a serious risk if exposed or intercepted.

Waltz himself is said to have received official schedules and documents through his personal Gmail account. However, Brian Hughes, spokesperson for the National Security Council, denied any wrongdoing.

“I’ve seen no evidence of Waltz using personal email as described,” Hughes told The Washington Post. He added that when work-related materials are sent to Waltz’s personal account, his government email is cc’d to comply with federal records laws.

“Waltz didn’t and wouldn’t send classified information on an open account,” Hughes emphasized.

When asked whether a Waltz staffer discussed sensitive military matters over Gmail, Hughes responded that NSC staff are instructed to use “only secure platforms for classified information.”

A Pattern of Lapses: The Signal Chat Incident

This email controversy follows a high-profile blunder just days earlier, in which Waltz mistakenly added The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg to a Signal group chat discussing U.S. airstrikes in Yemen. The group included senior Trump administration figures like Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

Goldberg, a journalist with no security clearance, was accidentally looped into real-time conversations about military strategy. The mistake sparked outrage and alarm from national security experts.

Waltz later admitted the error, took full responsibility, and called the situation “embarrassing.” He could not explain how Goldberg’s number ended up in the chat but claimed the group was later deleted and reassembled with tighter controls.

Mounting Pressure and Political Fallout

These incidents have raised red flags on Capitol Hill. House Oversight Chair James Comer has called for an investigation into Waltz’s use of personal email for government work, emphasizing the risk of compromising sensitive data.

Inside the administration, tension is rising. Reports suggest that Vice President Vance and Chief of Staff Susie Wiles privately urged President Trump to consider replacing Waltz after the Signal leak. However, Trump appears to be standing by his advisor — at least for now — calling the scandal “overblown” and asserting that Waltz “has learned from the mistake.”

Still, the political damage may not be so easily contained. Critics argue that these repeated missteps reflect broader issues with operational discipline and information security at the top levels of the Trump administration.

What’s Next?

While no classified data has been confirmed as compromised, the situation has drawn uncomfortable parallels to past controversies involving unsecured communications — some of which Trump himself has long criticized.

As calls for oversight grow louder and questions mount about Miike Waltz’s judgment, his future in the administration remains uncertain.

For now, one thing is clear: when it comes to national security, even small errors in communication protocols can carry massive consequences.

Who Are the Houthi Rebels? Origins, Military Strength, Leaders, And Major Attacks Trump orders strikes on Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen. Who are the Houthi rebels?

Fact-Check: The Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg in Top Secret Yemen War Chat Jeffrey Goldberg unexpectedly gained access to classified discussions among top Trump officials regarding military actions in Yemen. How did this happen, and what does it ...

What is Signal App? Houthi War Chat Leak, And Security Warnings Signal App: What is It, Who Created It, and Why is It Under Scrutiny After the Yemen War Chat Leak?